Basu Vijayakumari vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP — WP/15318/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010290822026

Filing Number

WP/23236/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15318/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Subba Reddy Satti

Coram

Subba Reddy Satti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP.(MISC.MATTERS) ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Basu Vijayakumari

    Adv. ANAND KUMAR KOCHIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

  2. 2.The Macherla Municipality

  3. 3.The Municipal Commisioner

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 15318/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted interim relief to petitioner Basu Vijayakumari, restraining the Macherla Municipality Commissioner from taking coercive steps toward demolishing her building (D.No.12-1-112) for four weeks. The petitioner challenged a demolition notice issued without proper hearing or survey conducted in her presence. The court directed the petitioner to submit an explanation with supporting documents to the Commissioner and listed the matter for further hearing on 25.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15318/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 15318/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted interim relief to petitioner Basu Vijayakumari, restraining the Macherla Municipality Commissioner from taking coercive steps toward demolishing her building (D.No.12-1-112) for four weeks. The petitioner challenged a demolition notice issued without proper hearing or survey conducted in her presence. The court directed the petitioner to submit an explanation with supporting documents to the Commissioner and listed the matter for further hearing on 25.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case