Smt. Chennareddygari Ankalamma alis Anitha vs THE STATE .The State of Andhra Pradesh,OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15309/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010290662026

Filing Number

WP/23226/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15309/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Chennareddygari Ankalamma alis Anitha

    Adv. B S REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE .The State of Andhra Pradesh,OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Inspector General of Police

  3. 3.The Superintendent of Police,

  4. 4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police

  5. 5.The Circle Inspector

  6. 6.The Circle Inspector

  7. 7.The Station House Officer

  8. 8.The Station House Officer

  9. 9.B.G. Ramesh Chandra Babu @ B.G.Ramesh

  10. 10.B.G. Sateesh Chandra Babu @ B.G. Sateesh,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 15309/2026 Decision: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted the petitioner's writ petition and directed police respondents not to interfere in the civil property dispute between the parties. The court accepted the police's submission that they lack jurisdiction over civil matters involving title, ownership, and possession disputes, which are properly cognizable only by civil courts. Key Reasoning: The police authorities confirmed they had taken no coercive action against the petitioner and had not favored either party in the civil litigation (OS No.12 of 2022 pending before the III Additional District Judge, Nandyal). The court noted that property disputes fall outside police jurisdiction. Conditions: The order does not prevent police action if any criminal complaint is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Home)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15309/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 15309/2026 Decision: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted the petitioner's writ petition and directed police respondents not to interfere in the civil property dispute between the parties. The court accepted the police's submission that they lack jurisdiction over civil matters involving title, ownership, and possession disputes, which are properly cognizable only by civil courts. Key Reasoning: The police authorities confirmed they had taken no coercive action against the petitioner and had not favored either party in the civil litigation (OS No.12 of 2022 pending before the III Additional District Judge, Nandyal). The court noted that property disputes fall outside police jurisdiction. Conditions: The order does not prevent police action if any criminal complaint is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case