KETHU RAVI CHANDRA REDDY vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/14487/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010280932026

Filing Number

WP/22491/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

WP/14487/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Coram

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KETHU RAVI CHANDRA REDDY

    Adv. P RAVIKANTH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector,

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer

  4. 4.The Tahsildar

  5. 5.The Village Revenue Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 14487/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh directed revenue officials (District Collector, Revenue Divisional Officer, Tahsildar, and Village Revenue Officer) not to interfere with petitioner Kethu Ravi Chandra Reddy's peaceful possession and livelihood activities on 0.06 acres of Grama Kantam (panchayat) land in YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law. The court held that regardless of property ownership disputes, the respondents cannot remove the petitioner's temporary cattle shelter without adhering to legal procedures, protecting the petitioner's constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, and 300-A. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  4. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/14487/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 14487/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh directed revenue officials (District Collector, Revenue Divisional Officer, Tahsildar, and Village Revenue Officer) not to interfere with petitioner Kethu Ravi Chandra Reddy's peaceful possession and livelihood activities on 0.06 acres of Grama Kantam (panchayat) land in YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law. The court held that regardless of property ownership disputes, the respondents cannot remove the petitioner's temporary cattle shelter without adhering to legal procedures, protecting the petitioner's constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, and 300-A. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case