P THIMMAPPA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES I — WA/600/2023

Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

CNR: APHC010269532023

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

WA/21879/2023

Filing Date

13-06-2023

Registration No

WA/600/2023

Registration Date

19-06-2023

Judge

LISA GILL , NINALA JAYASURYA

Coram

LISA GILL , NINALA JAYASURYA

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

FINANCE & PLANNING (MISC.MATTERS) ( 59 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Acts & Sections

Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

P THIMMAPPA

Adv. ADAPA RAMYA SAHITHI NAIDU

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES I

Superintending Engineer Panchayai. Raj Department

Executive Engineer

District Collector

Deputy Director

Adv. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP)

District Audit Officer

Adv. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Deputy Director

Hearing History

Judge: LISA GILL , NINALA JAYASURYA

20-06-2023

FOR ADMISSION

16-06-2026

ADMISSION

10-04-2026

ADMISSION

10-03-2026

ADMISSION

03-03-2026

ADMISSION

Orders

10-04-2026
LISA GILL,NINALA JAYASURYA

Summary: In Writ Appeal No. 600-2023 (P Thimmappa v. The State of Andhra Pradesh), the Interlocutory Application No. 1 of 2026 was allowed, and Respondent Nos. 8 and 9 (Corporation) were impleaded as parties subject to just exceptions. The main appeal was adjourned to 15.06.2026 at the request of the Corporation's counsel, with directions that an affidavit from a responsible officer of the Corporation reflecting its position be filed before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Writ Appeal No. 600-2023 (P Thimmappa v. The State of Andhra Pradesh), the Interlocutory Application No. 1 of 2026 was allowed, and Respondent Nos. 8 and 9 (Corporation) were impleaded as parties subject to just exceptions. The main appeal was adjourned to 15.06.2026 at the request of the Corporation's counsel, with directions that an affidavit from a responsible officer of the Corporation reflecting its position be filed before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case