Pasupulati Padmavathi, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP, ,GP FOR REVENUE,ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO — WP/20416/2016
Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 16th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010192192016
Filing Number
WP/108508/2016
Filing Date
23-Jun-2016
Registration No
WP/20416/2016
Registration Date
23-Jun-2016
Judge
Harinath.n
Coram
Harinath.n
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
DEMOLITION-REMOVAL ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pasupulati Padmavathi,
Adv. SREENIVASA RAO RAVULAPATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP, ,GP FOR REVENUE,ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO
-
2.The District Collector,
-
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
-
4.The Mandal Revenue Officer,
-
5.The Ongole City Municipal Corporation, Represented by
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Harinath.nView PDF
Summary of WP/20416/2016 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Pasupulati Padmavathi challenging the respondents' action regarding demolition of her property (H.No 19-7-29, Ongole City). The court disposed the petition in terms of an interim order granted earlier on 24.06.2016, which had directed a stay on demolition while permitting respondents to proceed in accordance with law. No costs were awarded, and all miscellaneous petitions were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jun-2016
Admission (Revenue)
A V Sesha Sai
-
23-Jun-2016
Case filed
Registration No. WP/20416/2016
Summary of WP/20416/2016 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Pasupulati Padmavathi challenging the respondents' action regarding demolition of her property (H.No 19-7-29, Ongole City). The court disposed the petition in terms of an interim order granted earlier on 24.06.2016, which had directed a stay on demolition while permitting respondents to proceed in accordance with law. No costs were awarded, and all miscellaneous petitions were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts