DURGA PRASAD JAGARLAMUDI vs S. CHENCHU KIRAN KUMAR Advocate - KANDERI CHETHAN — CRP/1102/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010186332026

Filing Number

CRP/14993/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRP/1102/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Ninala Jayasurya

Coram

Ninala Jayasurya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRP ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ARTICLE 227 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DURGA PRASAD JAGARLAMUDI

    Adv. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

  2. 2.Vasudev Jagarlamudi

  3. 3.Nisha Parikh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S. CHENCHU KIRAN KUMAR Advocate - KANDERI CHETHAN

  2. 2.Sathyanarayana Vinod Kumar

  3. 3.Sathyanarayana Bharath kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Ninala JayasuryaView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of a Civil Revision Petition without examining merits, as a counter-reply had been filed in the underlying interlocutory application and the case was already scheduled for hearing on 29.04.2026. Justice Ninala Jayasurya directed the Civil Judge (Senior Division) to expeditiously dispose of the interlocutory application (seeking temporary injunction to prevent interference with property possession and stored herbal agricultural products) in accordance with law after affording due opportunity to both parties, without awarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Crp Matters)

    Ninala Jayasurya

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    For Orders Of Court

    Ninala Jayasurya

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Ninala JayasuryaView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/1102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of a Civil Revision Petition without examining merits, as a counter-reply had been filed in the underlying interlocutory application and the case was already scheduled for hearing on 29.04.2026. Justice Ninala Jayasurya directed the Civil Judge (Senior Division) to expeditiously dispose of the interlocutory application (seeking temporary injunction to prevent interference with property possession and stored herbal agricultural products) in accordance with law after affording due opportunity to both parties, without awarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case