Nakka Rajeev Babu alias Raju vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2458/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480AND483. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010162712026

e-Filing Number

23-03-2026

Filing Number

CRLP/3187/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/2458/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Coram

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s. 480 and 483 BNSS – Regular Bail(CRL.4B-N) ( 149 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480AND483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nakka Rajeev Babu alias Raju

    Adv. B.SUDHAKAR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

    The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the bail petition of Nakka Rajeev Babu, who was accused of drug trafficking (5.100 kgs narcotic drugs), illegal weapons possession, and other serious offenses under NDPS Act and Arms Act. The court rejected the accused's arguments of false implication and non-commercial quantity, holding that the investigation was still ongoing and specific allegations existed against him, making bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/2458/2026

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the bail petition of Nakka Rajeev Babu, who was accused of drug trafficking (5.100 kgs narcotic drugs), illegal weapons possession, and other serious offenses under NDPS Act and Arms Act. The court rejected the accused's arguments of false implication and non-commercial quantity, holding that the investigation was still ongoing and specific allegations existed against him, making bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case