Prasad alias Mallela Hemanth Prasad vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/2467/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010159952026

Filing Number

CRLP/3128/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/2467/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Coram

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 BNSS Anticipatory Bail(CRL.4A-N) ( 148 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prasad alias Mallela Hemanth Prasad

    Adv. A VARALAKSHMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed Prasad's petition for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 151/2025, which involved armed criminal trespass, assault, and threats related to a missing person case. The court found that previous bail applications had already been dismissed by lower courts and no material change in circumstances warranted reconsideration, holding that successive bail applications require substantial changes in facts to be maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)

    Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/2467/2026

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed Prasad's petition for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 151/2025, which involved armed criminal trespass, assault, and threats related to a missing person case. The court found that previous bail applications had already been dismissed by lower courts and no material change in circumstances warranted reconsideration, holding that successive bail applications require substantial changes in facts to be maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case