SAPPA VENKATALAKSHMI vs THE GOVERNMENT OF AP Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP — WP/9111/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010150372026

Filing Number

WP/12077/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/9111/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Coram

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP.(MISC.MATTERS) ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAPPA VENKATALAKSHMI

    Adv. MUSUDI BABJI

  2. 2.Peddireddy Kumari,

  3. 3.Patnala Adilakshmi,

  4. 4.Muni Lakshmi,

  5. 5.Dasari Kalavathi,

  6. 6.Arusha Bhattu Ananta Lakshmi,

  7. 7.Sabbitha Triveni,

  8. 8.Dhavaleswarapu Sarojini,

  9. 9.Ponnaganti Appayamma,

  10. 10.Peruri Nageswarai,

  11. 11.Beedilla Lakshmi,

  12. 12.Tanubuddi Shiva Satyavathi,

  13. 13.Nookathattu Ammaji,

  14. 14.Burri Ramesh,

  15. 15.Javani Kantham,

  16. 16.Jilagam Chandra Sekhar,

  17. 17.Rimmalapudi Satish,

  18. 18.Eagala Satyavathi,

  19. 19.Doddigarla Mariyamma,

  20. 20.Tatapudi Ramanamma,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE GOVERNMENT OF AP Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

  2. 2.The District Collector,

    Adv. GP FOR REVENUE

  3. 3.The Sub-Collector,

  4. 4.The Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation,

  5. 5.The City Planner,

  6. 6.The Tahsildar,

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Incomplete Matters

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 9111 of 2026, High Court of Andhra Pradesh: Twenty petitioners (mostly coolies and pensioners) challenged their dispossession from house properties in Indira Satya Nagar, Rajamahendravaram without alternative accommodation. The court granted an interim status quo order restraining respondents (Municipal Corporation and revenue officials) from evicting the petitioners pending final adjudication. Counter-affidavits must be filed within four weeks, with rejoinders within two weeks thereafter, and the matter is listed for next hearing on 23.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 9111 of 2026, High Court of Andhra Pradesh: Twenty petitioners (mostly coolies and pensioners) challenged their dispossession from house properties in Indira Satya Nagar, Rajamahendravaram without alternative accommodation. The court granted an interim status quo order restraining respondents (Municipal Corporation and revenue officials) from evicting the petitioners pending final adjudication. Counter-affidavits must be filed within four weeks, with rejoinders within two weeks thereafter, and the matter is listed for next hearing on 23.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case