GUTTULA VENKATESWARA RAO vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/8158/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010148652026

Filing Number

WP/11935/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/8158/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Coram

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUTTULA VENKATESWARA RAO

    Adv. ALLA RAMA KRISHNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Director General of Police,

  3. 3.The Commissioner of Police,

  4. 4.The Assistant Commissioner of Police,

  5. 5.The Station House Officer,

  6. 6.The Sub-Inspector of Police,

  7. 7.Peketi Narayana Rao,

  8. 8.Peketi Prasada Rao,

  9. 9.Eswarapu Gopala Krishna,

  10. 10.Eswarapu Lalitha,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition and directed police not to summon the petitioner to the station or interfere in civil disputes without following due process of law. The court found that while a complaint was lodged regarding a development agreement dispute, the matter was primarily civil in nature and police should not be used to coerce settlement of such disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Admission (Home)

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/8158/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition and directed police not to summon the petitioner to the station or interfere in civil disputes without following due process of law. The court found that while a complaint was lodged regarding a development agreement dispute, the matter was primarily civil in nature and police should not be used to coerce settlement of such disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case