B. Rajagopal Naidu vs The state of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/918/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010078112024

Filing Number

CRLP/1290/2024

Filing Date

15-Feb-2024

Registration No

CRLP/918/2024

Registration Date

15-Feb-2024

Judge

K Suresh Reddy

Coram

K Suresh Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

Other offences not covered above ( 141 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B. Rajagopal Naidu

    Adv. BHASKAR PREM KOUSHIK

  2. 2.S. Mallikhaijuna Rao,

    Adv. BHASKAR PREM KOUSHIK

  3. 3.Shreya Broadcasting Pvt Ltd Company

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The state of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Gundupalli Surya Prakash Rao

    Adv. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    K Suresh Reddy

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

    Summary: In Criminal Petition No. 918 of 2024, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh extended the previously granted interim order staying all proceedings in the criminal case against the three accused (related to charges under IT Act 2000, IPC sections 354C, 201, and Indecent Representation of Women Act 1986). The case was adjourned to 19.06.2026 after the complainant (Respondent No.2) withdrew the case with "no objection," and the petitioner's counsel was directed to serve personal notice via speed post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    K Suresh Reddy

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    K Suresh Reddy

  11. 23-Jan-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  13. 26-Dec-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  14. 26-Dec-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  15. 26-Dec-2025

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    K Suresh Reddy

  16. 12-Dec-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  17. 12-Dec-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  18. 19-Sep-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  19. 19-Feb-2025

    B V L N ChakravarthiView PDF

  20. 19-Feb-2025

    B V L N ChakravarthiView PDF

  21. 16-Dec-2024

    B V L N ChakravarthiView PDF

  22. 06-Dec-2024

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    B V L N Chakravarthi

  23. 26-Oct-2024

    B V L N ChakravarthiView PDF

  24. 26-Oct-2024

    B V L N ChakravarthiView PDF

  25. 20-Sep-2024

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    B V L N Chakravarthi

  26. 09-Aug-2024

    B V L N ChakravarthiView PDF

  27. 01-Jul-2024

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  28. 06-May-2024

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  29. 11-Apr-2024

    Admission

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  30. 21-Mar-2024

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  31. 20-Mar-2024

    For Admission

    B S Bhanumathi

  32. 21-Feb-2024

    B S BhanumathiView PDF

  33. 21-Feb-2024

    B S BhanumathiView PDF

  34. 21-Feb-2024

    B S BhanumathiView PDF

  35. 21-Feb-2024

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  36. 21-Feb-2024

    For Admission

    B S Bhanumathi

  37. 19-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 15-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/918/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Petition No. 918 of 2024, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh extended the previously granted interim order staying all proceedings in the criminal case against the three accused (related to charges under IT Act 2000, IPC sections 354C, 201, and Indecent Representation of Women Act 1986). The case was adjourned to 19.06.2026 after the complainant (Respondent No.2) withdrew the case with "no objection," and the petitioner's counsel was directed to serve personal notice via speed post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case