GOLU PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,ANOOP KUMAR DUBEY,SUDHIR TIWARI — BAIL/45525/2025

Disposed: -- on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Jan-2026

CNR: UPHC017011192025

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

16-Dec-2025

Registration No

BAIL/45525/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Judge

Harvir Singh

Coram

Harvir Singh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOLU PANDEY

    Adv. SARVANAND PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,ANOOP KUMAR DUBEY,SUDHIR TIWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Harvir SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad rejected Golu Pandey's bail application in a case involving assault charges under BNS Sections 191, 115, 352, 351, and 109. The court found that one victim (Nabi Rasool) sustained grievous injuries dangerous to life, including stitched head wounds, which outweighed the applicant's arguments of false implication and lack of specific role assignment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Harvir Singh

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Harvir SinghView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Santosh Rai

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Santosh Rai

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Santosh Rai

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Santosh Rai

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Santosh Rai

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Santosh RaiView PDF

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    Santosh Rai

  13. 16-Jan-2026

    Santosh RaiView PDF

  14. 15-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 06-Jan-2026

    Santosh RaiView PDF

  16. 16-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/45525/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad rejected Golu Pandey's bail application in a case involving assault charges under BNS Sections 191, 115, 352, 351, and 109. The court found that one victim (Nabi Rasool) sustained grievous injuries dangerous to life, including stitched head wounds, which outweighed the applicant's arguments of false implication and lack of specific role assignment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case