GUDIA GAUTAM vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., VINOD KUMAR SHUKLA — NA528/38912/2025

Case under Andhra State Act Section 120-B,43-120-B. Disposed: -- on 18th February 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Oct-2025

CNR: UPHC015219832025

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

NA528/38912/2025

Registration Date

27-Sep-2025

Judge

Vivek Kumar Singh

Coram

Vivek Kumar Singh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 120-B,43-120-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUDIA GAUTAM

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., VINOD KUMAR SHUKLA

  2. 2.INFORMANT

    Adv. VINOD KUMAR SHUKLA

  3. 3.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE

    Adv. VINOD KUMAR SHUKLA

  4. 4.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE

    Adv. VINOD KUMAR SHUKLA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Avnish SaxenaView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the application filed by Gudia Gautam under Section 528 BNSS, finding that the matter did not involve allegations of rape against the applicant. The court directed that the case be listed before an appropriate court dealing with the relevant roster for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Avnish SaxenaView PDF

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Avnish SaxenaView PDF

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Oct-2025

    Avnish SaxenaView PDF

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/38912/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the application filed by Gudia Gautam under Section 528 BNSS, finding that the matter did not involve allegations of rape against the applicant. The court directed that the case be listed before an appropriate court dealing with the relevant roster for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case