JAGDISH PRASAD AND 2 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS — WRIB/3689/2025

Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jul-2026

CNR: UPHC014696792025

Filing Number

WRIB/

Filing Date

03-Sep-2025

Registration No

WRIB/3689/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ( 100100 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISH PRASAD AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH GARG

  2. 2.GHASITAVA

  3. 3.KULDEEP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

    Adv. RAM SINGH,C.S.C.,SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA,SHEO KINKAR SINGH 1123

  2. 2.DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

    Adv. SHEO KINKAR SINGH SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA C.S.C. RAM SINGH

  3. 3.SETTLEMENT OFFICER OF CONSOLIDATION

    Adv. SHEO KINKAR SINGH SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA C.S.C. RAM SINGH

  4. 4.CONSOLIDATION OFFICER NARAINI

    Adv. SHEO KINKAR SINGH SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA C.S.C. RAM SINGH

  5. 5.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TEHSIL ATARRA

    Adv. SHEO KINKAR SINGH SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA C.S.C. RAM SINGH

  6. 6.TAHSILDAR, TEHSIL ATARRA

    Adv. SHEO KINKAR SINGH SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA C.S.C. RAM SINGH

  7. 7.RAJ KARAN

    Adv. SHEO KINKAR SINGH SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA C.S.C. RAM SINGH

  8. 8.BACHCHA

    Adv. SHEO KINKAR SINGH SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA C.S.C. RAM SINGH

  9. 9.MUNNA

    Adv. SHEO KINKAR SINGH SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA C.S.C. RAM SINGH

  10. 10.RAMKARAN

    Adv. SHEO KINKAR SINGH SURYAPRAKASH SHARMA C.S.C. RAM SINGH

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jul-2026

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF

    Case Summary: WRIB 3689/2025 The High Court of Allahabad heard a writ petition by Jagdish Prasad and others challenging a Consolidation Officer's order dated 16.4.2025 regarding land recording rights under U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The court adjourned the case for further hearing on 16.7.2026, directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within six weeks, and granted an interim stay on the impugned order's operation pending final determination of whether basic year entries or consolidation operation orders should prevail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Dinesh Pathak

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF

  9. 19-Mar-2026

    Dinesh Pathak

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Dinesh Pathak

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Anish Kumar Gupta

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Anish Kumar Gupta

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Dinesh Pathak

  14. 05-Feb-2026

    Dinesh Pathak

  15. 29-Jan-2026

    Kshitij Shailendra

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Dinesh Pathak

  17. 16-Jan-2026

    Dinesh PathakView PDF

  18. 16-Jan-2026

    Dinesh Pathak

  19. 08-Jan-2026

    Fresh

    Prakash Padia

  20. 18-Dec-2025

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  21. 09-Dec-2025

    Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF

  22. 09-Dec-2025

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  23. 02-Dec-2025

    Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

  24. 25-Nov-2025

    Fresh

    Prakash Padia

  25. 18-Nov-2025

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  26. 12-Nov-2025

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  27. 04-Nov-2025

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  28. 27-Oct-2025

    Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF

  29. 27-Oct-2025

    Manju Rani Chauhan

  30. 13-Oct-2025

    Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)

  31. 06-Oct-2025

    Ajay Bhanot

  32. 22-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 12-Sep-2025

    Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF

  34. 03-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIB/3689/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WRIB 3689/2025 The High Court of Allahabad heard a writ petition by Jagdish Prasad and others challenging a Consolidation Officer's order dated 16.4.2025 regarding land recording rights under U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The court adjourned the case for further hearing on 16.7.2026, directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within six weeks, and granted an interim stay on the impugned order's operation pending final determination of whether basic year entries or consolidation operation orders should prevail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case