ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA vs INDIAN BANK THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND 3 OTHERS — WRIA/5299/2024
Disposed: -- on 06th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011845412024
Filing Number
WRIA/68177/2024
Filing Date
29-Mar-2024
Registration No
WRIA/5299/2024
Registration Date
02-Apr-2024
Judge
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Coram
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CORPORATION/UNDERTAKING STAFF (SINGLE BENCH) ( 13500 )
Sub-Category
Promotion ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Adv. JAVED HUSAIN KHAN,GULREZ KHAN,GULREZ KHAN, ,GULREZ KHAN,GULREZ KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDIAN BANK THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ,PASHUPATI NATH TRIPATHI,PASHUPATI NATH TRIPATHI 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
06-Apr-2026
Saurabh Shyam ShamsheryView PDF
Summary: WRIA 5299/2024 - Anil Kumar Srivastava v. Indian Bank The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the petition, holding that it cannot re-examine compliance with its earlier orders since a compliance affidavit was filed before the Supreme Court and the SLP was disposed of with the observation that the High Court's orders were satisfied. The court directed the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court if he has grievances regarding the adequacy of the compliance affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
For Admission
Vikram D Chauhan
-
02-Dec-2025
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
14-Oct-2025
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
20-Aug-2025
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
04-Jun-2025
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
22-Apr-2025
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
28-Feb-2025
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
06-Jan-2025
—
J.J. Munir
-
09-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WRIA/5299/2024
Summary: WRIA 5299/2024 - Anil Kumar Srivastava v. Indian Bank The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the petition, holding that it cannot re-examine compliance with its earlier orders since a compliance affidavit was filed before the Supreme Court and the SLP was disposed of with the observation that the High Court's orders were satisfied. The court directed the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court if he has grievances regarding the adequacy of the compliance affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts