ANKIT vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/2106/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 468,43-468. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Next hearing 25-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011658162026

Filing Number

CRLR/

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLR/2106/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 468,43-468

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKIT

    Adv. SHRAVANA KUMAR YADAV,SANDEEP KUMAR,SANDEEP KUMAR, ,SANDEEP KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MANOJ KUMAR CHAHAL

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  3. 18-May-2026

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  4. 11-May-2026

    —

    Lakshmi Kant Shukla

  5. 04-May-2026

    —

    Divesh Chandra Samant

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    —

    Manoj Bajaj

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    Subhash Chandra SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLR 2106/2026 The High Court of Allahabad admitted Ankit's criminal revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application dated 09.01.2026. Ankit argued that charges under Section 4/21 Mines and Mineral Act cannot be instituted by police report but only by competent authority complaint, which the trial court allegedly ignored. The court found the matter involves a substantial question of law and admitted the revision. The case has been listed for fresh hearing on 20.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/2106/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLR 2106/2026 The High Court of Allahabad admitted Ankit's criminal revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application dated 09.01.2026. Ankit argued that charges under Section 4/21 Mines and Mineral Act cannot be instituted by police report but only by competent authority complaint, which the trial court allegedly ignored. The court found the matter involves a substantial question of law and admitted the revision. The case has been listed for fresh hearing on 20.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case