VIJAY PRATAP SINGH AND 2 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/2627/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 34,43-34. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011362012026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLA/2627/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal u/s 14 (A)(1) against judgment of conviction passed by Exclusive special (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015 (Single bench) ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY PRATAP SINGH AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. RAJESH PRATAP SINGH,AUSHIM LUTHRA,AUSHIM LUTHRA, ,AUSHIM LUTHRA
-
2.DHARMENDRA SINGH
Adv. AUSHIM LUTHRA
-
3.RAJESH PRATAP SINGH
Adv. AUSHIM LUTHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SMT. SAVITRI SAROJ
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
20-May-2026
—
Santosh Rai
-
13-May-2026
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
06-May-2026
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
29-Apr-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
22-Apr-2026
—
Sameer Jain
-
15-Apr-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
03-Apr-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
28-Mar-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
20-Mar-2026
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 2627/2026, the Allahabad High Court admitted the appeal of Vijay Pratap Singh and two others against their conviction under Section 323/34 IPC with a fine of Rs. 1,000. The Court stayed the conviction during the appeal's pendency, considering that the appellant is a primary teacher and the conviction could adversely affect his career prospects. Notice was directed to the informant, and the case was adjourned to April 7, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/2627/2026
Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 2627/2026, the Allahabad High Court admitted the appeal of Vijay Pratap Singh and two others against their conviction under Section 323/34 IPC with a fine of Rs. 1,000. The Court stayed the conviction during the appeal's pendency, considering that the appellant is a primary teacher and the conviction could adversely affect his career prospects. Notice was directed to the informant, and the case was adjourned to April 7, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts