RAJARAM vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS — WRIB/940/2026

Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011254522026

Filing Number

WRIB/

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIB/940/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ( 100100 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJARAM

    Adv. RISHIKESH TRIPATHI,SHASHWAT TRIPATHI,SHASHWAT TRIPATHI, ,SHASHWAT TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C.,ACHAL SINGH 1123

  2. 2.DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

    Adv. ACHAL SINGH C.S.C.

  3. 3.SETTLEMENT OFFICER OF CONSOLIDATION

    Adv. ACHAL SINGH C.S.C.

  4. 4.CONSOLIDATION OFFICER

    Adv. ACHAL SINGH C.S.C.

  5. 5.GAON SABHA KHADESAR, TEHSIL-TAHARAULI

    Adv. ACHAL SINGH C.S.C.

  6. 6.RAMSU

    Adv. ACHAL SINGH C.S.C.

  7. 7.ANAND KUMAR

    Adv. ACHAL SINGH C.S.C.

Case History

  1. 15-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    —

    Chandra Kumar Rai

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Order

    Dinesh Pathak

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Dinesh PathakView PDF

    The High Court at Allahabad adjourned the case to 08.05.2026, issuing notice to respondents 6 and 7. The court found the matter requires consideration regarding petitioner Rajaram's claim that consolidation courts illegally rejected his property ownership based on alleged parentage to Bholete @ Durjan. Parties must exchange affidavits before the next hearing, with any property transfer subject to Transfer of Property Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIB/940/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Allahabad adjourned the case to 08.05.2026, issuing notice to respondents 6 and 7. The court found the matter requires consideration regarding petitioner Rajaram's claim that consolidation courts illegally rejected his property ownership based on alleged parentage to Bholete @ Durjan. Parties must exchange affidavits before the next hearing, with any property transfer subject to Transfer of Property Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case