RAGHVENDRA SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — WRIB/909/2026

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011185562026

Filing Number

WRIB/

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIB/909/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Judge

Dinesh Pathak

Coram

Dinesh Pathak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ( 100100 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAGHVENDRA SINGH

    Adv. KARUNESH PRATAP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, RUSTAMPUR

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.SWATANTRA PRATAP SINGH

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.RAJESHWAR PRATAP SINGH

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Dinesh PathakView PDF

    WRIB/909/2026 - Summary The Allahabad High Court disposed of Raghvendra Singh's writ petition seeking expeditious resolution of a land consolidation case (Case No. 0884 of 2025) pending before the Consolidation Officer, Gorakhpur under the U.P.C.H. Act, 1953. The court directed the Consolidation Officer to decide the case within ten months, by reasoned order, after providing fair hearing to parties without unnecessary adjournments, without commenting on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    —

    Dinesh Pathak

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIB/909/2026

casestatus.in Summary

WRIB/909/2026 - Summary The Allahabad High Court disposed of Raghvendra Singh's writ petition seeking expeditious resolution of a land consolidation case (Case No. 0884 of 2025) pending before the Consolidation Officer, Gorakhpur under the U.P.C.H. Act, 1953. The court directed the Consolidation Officer to decide the case within ten months, by reasoned order, after providing fair hearing to parties without unnecessary adjournments, without commenting on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case