YADVENDRA @ YADVENDRA YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NABAIL/2242/2026
Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011028172026
Filing Number
NABAIL/
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
NABAIL/2242/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
ABAIL MINOR ( 64 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YADVENDRA @ YADVENDRA YADAV
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR YADAV,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV, ,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
20-May-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
13-May-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
06-May-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
29-Apr-2026
—
Avnish Saxena
-
22-Apr-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
08-Apr-2026
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
Case Summary: NABAIL/2242/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned Yadvendra Yadav's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. The court granted the Additional Government Advocate two weeks to obtain information regarding whether the investigation officer filed a police report and whether the applicant cooperated during investigation. The matter was posted for hearing on April 22, 2026, with any interim orders remaining effective until the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NABAIL/2242/2026
Case Summary: NABAIL/2242/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned Yadvendra Yadav's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. The court granted the Additional Government Advocate two weeks to obtain information regarding whether the investigation officer filed a police report and whether the applicant cooperated during investigation. The matter was posted for hearing on April 22, 2026, with any interim orders remaining effective until the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts