RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER — WRIA/2467/2026

Disposed: -- on 24th February 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Feb-2026

CNR: UPHC010961232026

Filing Number

WRIA/

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIA/2467/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Vikas Budhwar

Coram

Vikas Budhwar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (SINGLE BENCH) ( 11500 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

24-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR

    Adv. DIGVIJAY TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.PRABHAGIYA NIDESHAK SAMAJIK, BANIKI PRABHAG

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Feb-2026

    Vikas Budhwar

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Vikas BudhwarView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court found prima facie that Raj Kumar's suspension order violated U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, as it failed to mention any pending or contemplated inquiry—a necessary requirement for suspending an employee. The court granted the State's Standing Counsel time to obtain instructions on this legal defect and adjourned the case to February 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIA/2467/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court found prima facie that Raj Kumar's suspension order violated U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, as it failed to mention any pending or contemplated inquiry—a necessary requirement for suspending an employee. The court granted the State's Standing Counsel time to obtain instructions on this legal defect and adjourned the case to February 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case