SUSHILA DEVI vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/6976/2026
Disposed: -- on 05th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010907002026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
BAIL/6976/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Judge
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Coram
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUSHILA DEVI
Adv. RAMANUJ YADAV,RACHANA YADAV,RACHANA YADAV, ,RACHANA YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to 67-year-old Sushila Devi in a pension fraud case involving Rs. 43+ crore misappropriation. The court found her case similar to two co-accused (Laxmi Devi and Kamla Devi) already granted bail, noting she required no further custodial interrogation and a charge sheet was filed. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions against evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and criminal activity during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
—
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
08-Apr-2026
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
—
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
01-Apr-2026
—
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
25-Mar-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/6976/2026
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to 67-year-old Sushila Devi in a pension fraud case involving Rs. 43+ crore misappropriation. The court found her case similar to two co-accused (Laxmi Devi and Kamla Devi) already granted bail, noting she required no further custodial interrogation and a charge sheet was filed. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions against evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and criminal activity during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts