LAKHAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/345/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 304-B,43-304-B. Disposed: -- on 09th February 2026.
CNR: UPHC010342432026
Filing Number
CRLR/
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRLR/345/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Judge
Abdul Shahid
Coram
Abdul Shahid
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
09-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAKHAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. BRIJ BHUSHAN PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA,GAGAN PRATAP SINGH,GAGAN PRATAP SINGH, ,GAGAN PRATAP SINGH
-
2.RAGHUNATH SINGH
Adv. GAGAN PRATAP SINGH
-
3.PUSHPA DEVI
Adv. GAGAN PRATAP SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.BHURI SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Feb-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
09-Feb-2026
Abdul ShahidView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the criminal revision filed by Lakhan Singh, Raghunath Singh, and Pushpa Devi, upholding the trial court's rejection of their discharge application. The court found sufficient evidence to frame charges under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC, and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, relating to the death of a woman who committed suicide within seven years of marriage allegedly following dowry demands and cruelty. The court held that no meticulous evidence appreciation is permissible at the charge-framing stage and that the trial should proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Feb-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLR/345/2026
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the criminal revision filed by Lakhan Singh, Raghunath Singh, and Pushpa Devi, upholding the trial court's rejection of their discharge application. The court found sufficient evidence to frame charges under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC, and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, relating to the death of a woman who committed suicide within seven years of marriage allegedly following dowry demands and cruelty. The court held that no meticulous evidence appreciation is permissible at the charge-framing stage and that the trial should proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts