JITENDER SINGH BISHT vs KUNTI BISHT — FA/244/2025

Case under Family Courts Act, 1984 (Act No. 66 of 1984) Section 19. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

CNR: UKHC010213862025

Next Hearing

09th July 2026

Filing Number

FA/10475/2025

Filing Date

31-12-2025

Registration No

FA/244/2025

Registration Date

31-12-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION 19 OF FAMILY COURT ACT 1984 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Family Courts Act, 1984 (Act No. 66 of 1984) Section 19
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Act No. 25 of 1955) Section 28

Petitioner(s)

JITENDER SINGH BISHT

Adv. AKSHAY LATWAL,DEEPAK PETSHALI,DEEPAK PETSHALI, ,DEEPAK PETSHALI

Respondent(s)

KUNTI BISHT

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

02-01-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

09-07-2026

Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

15-04-2026

Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247

Orders

15-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Case F.A./244/2025 - Order Summary: The court ordered fresh steps be taken to effect service of the respondent within one week, with permission granted to the appellant to serve via alternative modes including electronic service. The case has been adjourned and listed for hearing on 09.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case F.A./244/2025 - Order Summary: The court ordered fresh steps be taken to effect service of the respondent within one week, with permission granted to the appellant to serve via alternative modes including electronic service. The case has been adjourned and listed for hearing on 09.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case