BRINDRAVAN ENTERPRISES PVT LTD vs STATE INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Advocate - VIPUL SHARMA — ARBAP/77/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No. 26 of 1996) Section 11(5). Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010211412025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

ARBAP/10302/2025

Filing Date

30-12-2025

Registration No

ARBAP/77/2025

Registration Date

30-12-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

ARBITRATION APPLICATION(SECTION-11) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No. 26 of 1996) Section 11(5)

Petitioner(s)

BRINDRAVAN ENTERPRISES PVT LTD

Adv. NEERAJ GARG,RAJENDRA ARYA,RAJENDRA ARYA, ,YASHPAL SINGH,RAJENDRA ARYA

Respondent(s)

STATE INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Advocate - VIPUL SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

31-12-2025

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

05-06-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Case Summary: ARBAP/77/2025 In ARBAP No. 77 of 2025, Brindravan Enterprises P Ltd. v. State Infrastructure and Industrial Development Corporation, the matter came before Hon'ble Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta on 05.06.2026. The case was adjourned upon request of the respondent's counsel Mr. Vinay Garg, who reported being involved in an accident requiring surgery. The matter is listed for hearing after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ARBAP/77/2025 In ARBAP No. 77 of 2025, Brindravan Enterprises P Ltd. v. State Infrastructure and Industrial Development Corporation, the matter came before Hon'ble Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta on 05.06.2026. The case was adjourned upon request of the respondent's counsel Mr. Vinay Garg, who reported being involved in an accident requiring surgery. The matter is listed for hearing after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case