VIKASH KUMAR vs BHUPESH DEVI Advocate - BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI, ,SAPNA RAWAT — FA/229/2025

Case under Family Courts Act, 1984 (Act No. 66 of 1984) Section 19. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010203512025

Next Hearing

28th May 2026

Filing Number

FA/9838/2025

Filing Date

18-12-2025

Registration No

FA/229/2025

Registration Date

18-12-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION 19 OF FAMILY COURT ACT 1984 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Family Courts Act, 1984 (Act No. 66 of 1984) Section 19

Petitioner(s)

VIKASH KUMAR

Adv. NEETU SINGH

Respondent(s)

BHUPESH DEVI Advocate - BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI, ,SAPNA RAWAT

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

19-12-2025

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

28-05-2026

Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

15-04-2026

Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247

Orders

15-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Summary: In First Appeal No. 229/2025, the Court (Hon'ble Justices Manoj Kumar Tiwari and Pankaj Purohit) adjourned the matter to 28.05.2026 in the interest of justice, as the respondent, though duly served on 21.02.2026, had no representative present to argue their case on the hearing date of 15.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In First Appeal No. 229/2025, the Court (Hon'ble Justices Manoj Kumar Tiwari and Pankaj Purohit) adjourned the matter to 28.05.2026 in the interest of justice, as the respondent, though duly served on 21.02.2026, had no representative present to argue their case on the hearing date of 15.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case