JAI SHANKAR TITIYAL Reema Rana (LEGAL AID) vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/790/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 354. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010201112024
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
CRLA/10712/2024
Filing Date
19-12-2024
Registration No
CRLA/790/2024
Registration Date
19-12-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. UPTO 10 YEARS & FINE ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAI SHANKAR TITIYAL Reema Rana (LEGAL AID)
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247
ORDER MATTERS -17
Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250
Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-12-2024 | Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247 |
| 07-07-2026 | ORDER MATTERS -17 |
| 02-01-2026 | Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250 |
| 08-01-2025 | Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247 |
Orders
CRLA No.790/2024 - Jai Shankar Titiyal v. State of Uttarakhand Bail granted. The appellant, convicted under IPC Section 354 and POCSO Sections 7/8 (sentenced to 5 years imprisonment each with Rs.20,000 fine), was released on bail by executing a personal bond and two sureties. The appellant was exempted from filing surety affidavits. The appeal is listed for 07.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CRLA No.790/2024 - Jai Shankar Titiyal v. State of Uttarakhand Bail granted. The appellant, convicted under IPC Section 354 and POCSO Sections 7/8 (sentenced to 5 years imprisonment each with Rs.20,000 fine), was released on bail by executing a personal bond and two sureties. The appellant was exempted from filing surety affidavits. The appeal is listed for 07.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts