GIRISH KUMAR P S BOHRA, ,PRABHAT BOHRA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /789/2024

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20(B)II(C). Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010201052024

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CRLA /10708/2024

Filing Date

19-12-2024

Registration No

CRLA /789/2024

Registration Date

19-12-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20(B)II(C)

Petitioner(s)

GIRISH KUMAR P S BOHRA, ,PRABHAT BOHRA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

20-12-2024

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

17-09-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

16-07-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

15-05-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

09-04-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Summary: Bail granted to appellants Kailash Singh and Girish Kumar in their NDPS appeals. The High Court of Uttarakhand found the search procedure unlawful because both appellants were jointly given the Section 50 option, which violates Supreme Court precedent. The court suspended the sentences and released the appellants on bail with personal bonds and two sureties each, pending appeal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail granted to appellants Kailash Singh and Girish Kumar in their NDPS appeals. The High Court of Uttarakhand found the search procedure unlawful because both appellants were jointly given the Section 50 option, which violates Supreme Court precedent. The court suspended the sentences and released the appellants on bail with personal bonds and two sureties each, pending appeal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case