MOHD AZRAM S. C BURMAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/3494/2025
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010201042025
Filing Number
WPMS/9724/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
WPMS/3494/2025
Registration Date
15-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHD AZRAM S. C BURMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.SUB DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.TEHSILDAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.TABASSUM
-
6.MOHD NADEEM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
Case Summary: WPMS/3494/2025 The High Court dismissed Mohd Azram's writ petition challenging the Tehsildar's order allowing Smt. Tabassum's mutation of name in revenue records based on a sale deed dated 02.03.2023. The court held that since Azram's suit for cancellation of the sale deed remains pending and undecided, the purchaser must be recorded as tenure holder in revenue records until a civil court decree cancels the deed. The petitioner was permitted to pursue his cancellation suit before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
03-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/3494/2025
Case Summary: WPMS/3494/2025 The High Court dismissed Mohd Azram's writ petition challenging the Tehsildar's order allowing Smt. Tabassum's mutation of name in revenue records based on a sale deed dated 02.03.2023. The court held that since Azram's suit for cancellation of the sale deed remains pending and undecided, the purchaser must be recorded as tenure holder in revenue records until a civil court decree cancels the deed. The petitioner was permitted to pursue his cancellation suit before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts