MOHAMMAD ARIF vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPPIL/223/2025
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010198452025
Filing Number
WPPIL/9593/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Registration No
WPPIL/223/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 45 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAMMAD ARIF
Adv. BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DIRECTOR GENERAL
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
7.MEMBER SECRETARY
-
8.ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FORESTS
-
9.YAMUNA STONE CRASHER
-
10.YAMUNA ASSOCIATE L L P
-
11.GANGA STONE CRESHER
-
12.GANPATI STONE CRASHER
-
13.M/S SATYAM SHIVAM SUNDARAM STONE
-
14.SRI SAI VESTA ENTERPRISES LL P
-
15.UNIVERSAL STONE CRUSHER
-
16.PARV MINES AND MINERAL LLP
-
17.AADI YOGI
-
18.NEW YAMUNA STONE
-
19.DIMAND STONE CRASHER
-
20.JAI SHRI SHYAM
-
21.SAI KRIPA STONE
-
22.SHIKHER ENTERPRISES
-
23.VAISHNO STONE
-
24.SIKANDER SINGH
-
25.NS DEVELOPERS
-
26.ARK ASSOCIATE
-
27.DEVBHUMI STONE CRESHER
Adv. MILIND RAJ
-
28.RADHYE SHYAM ENTERPRISES
-
29.JAGVEER SINGH
Adv. PRIYANKA AGRAWAL
-
30.VIJAY THAKUR
-
31.UTTARAKHAND STONE CRESHER LLP
Adv. MILIND RAJ
-
32.BALA SUNDARI STONE CRUSHER
Adv. S R S GILL
-
33.BALAJI STONE ARROGATE CRASHER
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Summary: In WPPIL No. 223 of 2025, the Uttarakhand High Court adjourned the case for six weeks. The petitioner's counsel was permitted to take fresh steps to serve unserved respondents and file a substitution application due to one respondent's death and incorrect addresses for others. The State was directed to file a counter-affidavit in the meantime, with the case to be listed after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
09-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPPIL/223/2025
Summary: In WPPIL No. 223 of 2025, the Uttarakhand High Court adjourned the case for six weeks. The petitioner's counsel was permitted to take fresh steps to serve unserved respondents and file a substitution application due to one respondent's death and incorrect addresses for others. The State was directed to file a counter-affidavit in the meantime, with the case to be listed after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts