PAYARA SINGH RATHOR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1655/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,376,506. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 15th April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010196932025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPCRL/10172/2025

Filing Date

09-12-2025

Registration No

WPCRL/1655/2025

Registration Date

09-12-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,376,506

Petitioner(s)

PAYARA SINGH RATHOR

Adv. RAJAT MITTAL

SANGEETA RATHOR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

DEEPA

Adv. AKLEMA PARVEEN(LEGAL AID)

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

11-12-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

24-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

15-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

The court dismissed the writ petition (WPCRL No. 1655 of 2025) as infructuous because the charge-sheet had already been filed, rendering the relief sought moot. The petitioner's counsel did not dispute this development, leading to the dismissal order by Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal on 15.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition (WPCRL No. 1655 of 2025) as infructuous because the charge-sheet had already been filed, rendering the relief sought moot. The petitioner's counsel did not dispute this development, leading to the dismissal order by Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal on 15.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case