CHNADRAKALA vs GIRISH CHANDRA BHATT — AO/543/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

CNR: UKHC010195122023

Next Hearing

02nd July 2026

Filing Number

AO/8666/2023

Filing Date

06-12-2023

Registration No

AO/543/2023

Registration Date

06-12-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173

Petitioner(s)

CHNADRAKALA

Adv. HARI MOHAN BHATIA,ALTAF HUSSAIN,ALTAF HUSSAIN, ALTAF HUSSAIN

MANISHA CHAND

KM NEHA CHAND

ASHISH CHAND

PARAS CHAND

Respondent(s)

GIRISH CHANDRA BHATT

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED BRANCH RUDRAPUR

Adv. SHAILABH PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

07-12-2023

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

02-07-2026

Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

20-11-2025

Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -255

10-10-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

29-08-2025

Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -255

Orders

07-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

In AO No. 543/2023, Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani issued notice to respondent no.1 (Girish Chandra Bhatt) returnable within six weeks, with directions to take steps within one week. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing on 02.07.2026. Notice on respondent no.2 (Oriental Insurance Company Limited) was served through video conferencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In AO No. 543/2023, Hon'ble Justice Ravindra Maithani issued notice to respondent no.1 (Girish Chandra Bhatt) returnable within six weeks, with directions to take steps within one week. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing on 02.07.2026. Notice on respondent no.2 (Oriental Insurance Company Limited) was served through video conferencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case