MONU CHAUHAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/2354/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,504,506,376(2)(n). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010193342025
Filing Number
BA1/9987/2025
Filing Date
03-Dec-2025
Registration No
BA1/2354/2025
Registration Date
03-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING THE TRIAL ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MONU CHAUHAN
Adv. GAURAV SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: BA1/2354/2025 The court granted bail to Monu Chauhan, accused of seduction under false promise of marriage (IPC §376(2)(n)) and related offenses. Hon'ble Justice Alok Mahra found that both parties were major adults, the alleged relationship was consensual and prolonged, the applicant has no criminal history, poses no flight risk or evidence tampering danger, and lengthy custody is unjustified given the trial's distant conclusion date. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Bail Order Matters (After Fresh) -254
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
20-Feb-2026
Bail Order Matters (After Fresh) -254
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
10-Jan-2026
Bail Order Matters (After Fresh) -254
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
24-Dec-2025
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
05-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/2354/2025
Case Summary: BA1/2354/2025 The court granted bail to Monu Chauhan, accused of seduction under false promise of marriage (IPC §376(2)(n)) and related offenses. Hon'ble Justice Alok Mahra found that both parties were major adults, the alleged relationship was consensual and prolonged, the applicant has no criminal history, poses no flight risk or evidence tampering danger, and lengthy custody is unjustified given the trial's distant conclusion date. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts