KANCHAN SINHA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/2142/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 279,201,304. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010190972025

Filing Number

C528/9861/2025

Filing Date

29-Nov-2025

Registration No

C528/2142/2025

Registration Date

29-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 279,201,304

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANCHAN SINHA

    Adv. AKSHAY PRADHAN

  2. 2.ESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.TAJUDEEN

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/2142/2025 Kanchan Sinha and Esha sought quashing of cognizance/summoning orders in a fatal hit-and-run case where they were charged under IPC Sections 279, 201, and 304. The applicants claimed they were merely passengers, not involved in the accident allegedly caused by the vehicle driver (now deceased). The court found the issues warrant deliberation and granted a stay on lower court proceedings. The State was granted four weeks to file a counter-affidavit, with the matter listed after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/2142/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/2142/2025 Kanchan Sinha and Esha sought quashing of cognizance/summoning orders in a fatal hit-and-run case where they were charged under IPC Sections 279, 201, and 304. The applicants claimed they were merely passengers, not involved in the accident allegedly caused by the vehicle driver (now deceased). The court found the issues warrant deliberation and granted a stay on lower court proceedings. The State was granted four weeks to file a counter-affidavit, with the matter listed after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case