KANCHAN SINHA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/2142/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 279,201,304. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010190972025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
C528/9861/2025
Filing Date
29-11-2025
Registration No
C528/2142/2025
Registration Date
29-11-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANCHAN SINHA
Adv. AKSHAY PRADHAN
ESHA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
TAJUDEEN
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-12-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 20-02-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: C528/2142/2025 Kanchan Sinha and Esha sought quashing of cognizance/summoning orders in a fatal hit-and-run case where they were charged under IPC Sections 279, 201, and 304. The applicants claimed they were merely passengers, not involved in the accident allegedly caused by the vehicle driver (now deceased). The court found the issues warrant deliberation and granted a stay on lower court proceedings. The State was granted four weeks to file a counter-affidavit, with the matter listed after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C528/2142/2025 Kanchan Sinha and Esha sought quashing of cognizance/summoning orders in a fatal hit-and-run case where they were charged under IPC Sections 279, 201, and 304. The applicants claimed they were merely passengers, not involved in the accident allegedly caused by the vehicle driver (now deceased). The court found the issues warrant deliberation and granted a stay on lower court proceedings. The State was granted four weeks to file a counter-affidavit, with the matter listed after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts