VASEEM ALIAS HAPPA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/701/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 332, 341, 342, 353, 395, 427, 436, 333, 412, 120B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010189622025

Filing Number

CRLA/9800/2025

Filing Date

27-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRLA/701/2025

Registration Date

27-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 30-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 332, 341, 342, 353, 395, 427, 436, 333, 412, 120B
Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 (Act No. 14 of 1908) Section 7
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (Act No. 3 of 1984) Section 3/4
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (Act No. 37 of 1967) Section 15/16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VASEEM ALIAS HAPPA

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand set aside the lower court's bail rejection and granted regular bail to Vaseem alias Happa, who was accused of rioting, arson, and violence during a 2024 demolition operation. The court found no direct evidence against the appellant, noting the prosecution could not establish who identified him from CCTV footage, and considered his two-year custody period as a mitigating factor warranting release on bail with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/701/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand set aside the lower court's bail rejection and granted regular bail to Vaseem alias Happa, who was accused of rioting, arson, and violence during a 2024 demolition operation. The court found no direct evidence against the appellant, noting the prosecution could not establish who identified him from CCTV footage, and considered his two-year custody period as a mitigating factor warranting release on bail with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case