ABHISHEK vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /697/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 363, 366, 376(2)(n), 376(3). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010189032025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLA /9780/2025
Filing Date
26-11-2025
Registration No
CRLA /697/2025
Registration Date
26-11-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABHISHEK
Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL,AVIDIT NOLIYAL, ,AVIDIT NOLIYAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-11-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 | |
| 25-03-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 | |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 | |
| 09-02-2026 | Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247 |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the bail application of Abhishek, who was convicted under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 376(3) and POCSO Act provisions for sexual offences against a minor. The court suspended the execution of the sentence and granted bail on condition of executing a personal bond with two sureties, noting that the victim had stated during investigation that she was in a consensual relationship with the appellant and willingly left her house. The case is listed for final hearing during the appeal pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the bail application of Abhishek, who was convicted under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 376(3) and POCSO Act provisions for sexual offences against a minor. The court suspended the execution of the sentence and granted bail on condition of executing a personal bond with two sureties, noting that the victim had stated during investigation that she was in a consensual relationship with the appellant and willingly left her house. The case is listed for final hearing during the appeal pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts