ALOK INFRABUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED vs BRIDGE ROPEWAY TUNNEL AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF UTTARAKHAND LTD Advocate - SHIV BHATT, KUMKUM BHATT — ARBAP/70/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No. 26 of 1996) Section 11(6). Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010188372025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

ARBAP/9093/2025

Filing Date

25-11-2025

Registration No

ARBAP/70/2025

Registration Date

25-11-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

ARBITRATION APPLICATION(SECTION-11) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No. 26 of 1996) Section 11(6)

Petitioner(s)

ALOK INFRABUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Adv. TEJAS AGARRWAL

Respondent(s)

BRIDGE ROPEWAY TUNNEL AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF UTTARAKHAND LTD Advocate - SHIV BHATT, KUMKUM BHATT

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

12-12-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

15-05-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

Orders

29-05-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Case Summary: ARBAP/70/2025 On 29.05.2026, Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta heard arguments between Alok Infrabuilders Pvt. Ltd. (applicant) and Bridge Ropeway Tunnel & Other Infrastructure Development Corporation of Uttarakhand Ltd. (respondent). The respondent's counsel sought additional time to file precedents supporting arguments on limitation bar. The court adjourned the matter for relisting, deferring a final order pending submission of these legal authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ARBAP/70/2025 On 29.05.2026, Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta heard arguments between Alok Infrabuilders Pvt. Ltd. (applicant) and Bridge Ropeway Tunnel & Other Infrastructure Development Corporation of Uttarakhand Ltd. (respondent). The respondent's counsel sought additional time to file precedents supporting arguments on limitation bar. The court adjourned the matter for relisting, deferring a final order pending submission of these legal authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case