ALOK INFRABUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED vs BRIDGE ROPEWAY TUNNEL AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Advocate - SHIV BHATT, KUMKUM BHATT — ARBAP/69/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No. 26 of 1996) Section 11. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010188242025
Filing Number
ARBAP/9082/2025
Filing Date
25-Nov-2025
Registration No
ARBAP/69/2025
Registration Date
25-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
ARBITRATION APPLICATION(SECTION-11) ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK INFRABUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. TEJAS AGARRWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.BRIDGE ROPEWAY TUNNEL AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Advocate - SHIV BHATT, KUMKUM BHATT
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar GuptaView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: ARBAP/69/2025 On 29.05.2026, the case between Alok Infrabuilders Pvt. Ltd. (applicant) and Bridge Ropeway Tunneal & Other Infrastructure Development Corporation (respondent) was heard before Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. The respondent's counsel sought additional time to place precedents supporting arguments regarding a bar of limitation. The court adjourned the case for further listing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar GuptaView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr Justice G. NarendarView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. ARBAP/69/2025
CASE SUMMARY: ARBAP/69/2025 On 29.05.2026, the case between Alok Infrabuilders Pvt. Ltd. (applicant) and Bridge Ropeway Tunneal & Other Infrastructure Development Corporation (respondent) was heard before Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. The respondent's counsel sought additional time to place precedents supporting arguments regarding a bar of limitation. The court adjourned the case for further listing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts