MAMTA SHIVANSH BAHUGUNA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/2108/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 307, 452. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010187522025
Filing Number
C528/9704/2025
Filing Date
24-Nov-2025
Registration No
C528/2108/2025
Registration Date
24-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAMTA SHIVANSH BAHUGUNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.CHATAR SINGH
Adv. VISHWA PRAKASH BAHUGUNA
-
3.HARI SINGH
Adv. VISHWA PRAKASH BAHUGUNA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: C528/2108/2025 The court allowed Mamta's compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings against her under Sections 307 and 452 IPC. The court found that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and affidavits confirmed the compromise; following Supreme Court precedent, non-compoundable offences may be compounded where conviction prospects are remote and continuation would cause injustice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
06-Jan-2026
Admission Matters -25
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
18-Dec-2025
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
09-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. C528/2108/2025
Case Summary: C528/2108/2025 The court allowed Mamta's compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings against her under Sections 307 and 452 IPC. The court found that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and affidavits confirmed the compromise; following Supreme Court precedent, non-compoundable offences may be compounded where conviction prospects are remote and continuation would cause injustice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts