MAMTA SHIVANSH BAHUGUNA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/2108/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 307, 452. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010187522025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528/9704/2025

Filing Date

24-11-2025

Registration No

C528/2108/2025

Registration Date

24-11-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 307, 452

Petitioner(s)

MAMTA SHIVANSH BAHUGUNA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

CHATAR SINGH

Adv. VISHWA PRAKASH BAHUGUNA

HARI SINGH

Adv. VISHWA PRAKASH BAHUGUNA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

26-11-2025

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

24-03-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

06-01-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

18-12-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

06-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: C528/2108/2025 The court allowed Mamta's compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings against her under Sections 307 and 452 IPC. The court found that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and affidavits confirmed the compromise; following Supreme Court precedent, non-compoundable offences may be compounded where conviction prospects are remote and continuation would cause injustice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/2108/2025 The court allowed Mamta's compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings against her under Sections 307 and 452 IPC. The court found that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and affidavits confirmed the compromise; following Supreme Court precedent, non-compoundable offences may be compounded where conviction prospects are remote and continuation would cause injustice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case