MS COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL INDIA PROPERTY SERVICES PVT LTD vs PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED — ARBAP/67/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No. 26 of 1996) Section 11(6). Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010186802025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

ARBAP/9017/2025

Filing Date

24-11-2025

Registration No

ARBAP/67/2025

Registration Date

24-11-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

ARBITRATION APPLICATION(SECTION-11) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No. 26 of 1996) Section 11(6)

Petitioner(s)

MS COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL INDIA PROPERTY SERVICES PVT LTD

Adv. IMRAN ALI KHAN,HARSH VARDHAN DHANIK,HARSH VARDHAN DHANIK, ,HARSH VARDHAN DHANIK

Respondent(s)

PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

12-12-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

08-05-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta

Case Summary: ARBAP/67/2025 The court appointed Justice Rajesh Bindal (Former Supreme Court Judge) as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between Colliers International India Property Services Pvt Ltd and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd arising from a Work Order dated 29.06.2024. Both parties consented to Delhi as the arbitration venue. The court directed that the arbitrator's consent and disclosures be obtained within four weeks, with further proceedings to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ARBAP/67/2025 The court appointed Justice Rajesh Bindal (Former Supreme Court Judge) as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between Colliers International India Property Services Pvt Ltd and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd arising from a Work Order dated 29.06.2024. Both parties consented to Delhi as the arbitration venue. The court directed that the arbitrator's consent and disclosures be obtained within four weeks, with further proceedings to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case