JAGAT SINGH CHAUDHARY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, DEHRADUN Advocate - G.A. — C482/2256/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010186392022

Filing Number

C482/10076/2022

Filing Date

16-Dec-2022

Registration No

C482/2256/2022

Registration Date

16-Dec-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 506
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Act No. 28 of 1961) Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGAT SINGH CHAUDHARY

    Adv. RAMJI SHRIVASTAVA,VIKRAM SINGH DHAPOLA,VIKRAM SINGH DHAPOLA, VIKRAM SINGH DHAPOLA

  2. 2.LATA ALIAS LATESH RANI

  3. 3.SUKRANT CHAUDHARY

  4. 4.SHIVANI CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, DEHRADUN Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SHARON YAMIN ALIAS SANCHI CHAUDHARY

    Adv. RAJAT MITTAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C482/2256/2022 The Uttarakhand High Court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 7288 of 2022 after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The dispute arose from matrimonial differences between applicant Sukrant Chaudhary and respondent Sharon Yamin (married November 1, 2019), with both parties filing mutual FIRs. The parties agreed to dissolve their marriage by consent under Section 27 of the UCC, with Sukrant paying ₹25 lakh permanent alimony to Sharon. The court found that continuation of proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused and allowed the offences to be compounded, thereby quashing all criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  5. 16-Jul-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  6. 09-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  7. 28-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  8. 28-Jun-2023

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  9. 26-May-2023

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  10. 01-Apr-2023

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  11. 13-Mar-2023

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  12. 19-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  13. 19-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 16-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. C482/2256/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C482/2256/2022 The Uttarakhand High Court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 7288 of 2022 after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The dispute arose from matrimonial differences between applicant Sukrant Chaudhary and respondent Sharon Yamin (married November 1, 2019), with both parties filing mutual FIRs. The parties agreed to dissolve their marriage by consent under Section 27 of the UCC, with Sukrant paying ₹25 lakh permanent alimony to Sharon. The court found that continuation of proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused and allowed the offences to be compounded, thereby quashing all criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case