JAGAT SINGH CHAUDHARY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, DEHRADUN Advocate - G.A. — C482/2256/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010186392022

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C482/10076/2022

Filing Date

16-12-2022

Registration No

C482/2256/2022

Registration Date

16-12-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 506
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Act No. 28 of 1961) Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

JAGAT SINGH CHAUDHARY

Adv. RAMJI SHRIVASTAVA,VIKRAM SINGH DHAPOLA,VIKRAM SINGH DHAPOLA, VIKRAM SINGH DHAPOLA

LATA ALIAS LATESH RANI

SUKRANT CHAUDHARY

SHIVANI CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME, DEHRADUN Advocate - G.A.

SHARON YAMIN ALIAS SANCHI CHAUDHARY

Adv. RAJAT MITTAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

19-12-2022

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

19-05-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

16-07-2025

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

28-06-2023

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

26-05-2023

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

Orders

19-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: C482/2256/2022 The Uttarakhand High Court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 7288 of 2022 after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The dispute arose from matrimonial differences between applicant Sukrant Chaudhary and respondent Sharon Yamin (married November 1, 2019), with both parties filing mutual FIRs. The parties agreed to dissolve their marriage by consent under Section 27 of the UCC, with Sukrant paying ₹25 lakh permanent alimony to Sharon. The court found that continuation of proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused and allowed the offences to be compounded, thereby quashing all criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C482/2256/2022 The Uttarakhand High Court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 7288 of 2022 after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The dispute arose from matrimonial differences between applicant Sukrant Chaudhary and respondent Sharon Yamin (married November 1, 2019), with both parties filing mutual FIRs. The parties agreed to dissolve their marriage by consent under Section 27 of the UCC, with Sukrant paying ₹25 lakh permanent alimony to Sharon. The court found that continuation of proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused and allowed the offences to be compounded, thereby quashing all criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case