ABU TASLEEM vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /679/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,149,307,332,353,427,435,436,120B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010184262025
Filing Number
CRLA /9533/2025
Filing Date
18-11-2025
Registration No
CRLA /679/2025
Registration Date
18-11-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABU TASLEEM
Adv. VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI,RISHABH BISHT,RISHABH BISHT, ,RISHABH BISHT
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-12-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 19-03-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 12-03-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 27-02-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed Abu Tasleem's criminal appeal and granted him regular bail, setting aside the lower court's bail rejection order. The court found no direct evidence connecting him to the February 2024 riots at Malik-ka-Bagicha in Haldwani, noting the prosecution could not clearly identify him from CCTV footage, and considered his two-year custodial detention sufficient. He was directed to furnish personal bond and two sureties for release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed Abu Tasleem's criminal appeal and granted him regular bail, setting aside the lower court's bail rejection order. The court found no direct evidence connecting him to the February 2024 riots at Malik-ka-Bagicha in Haldwani, noting the prosecution could not clearly identify him from CCTV footage, and considered his two-year custodial detention sufficient. He was directed to furnish personal bond and two sureties for release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts