ABU TASLEEM vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /680/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,149,307,323,332,341,342,353,395,427,436,333,412,120B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010184192025
Filing Number
CRLA /9531/2025
Filing Date
18-11-2025
Registration No
CRLA /680/2025
Registration Date
18-11-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABU TASLEEM
Adv. VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI,RISHABH BISHT,RISHABH BISHT, ,RISHABH BISHT
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-12-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 19-03-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 12-03-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 27-02-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed Abu Tasleem's criminal appeal and granted him regular bail, setting aside the lower court's rejection of his bail application. The court found no direct evidence against the appellant despite charges under serious offences including rioting, arson, and UAPA provisions related to a February 2024 violent incident; the court noted that the prosecution could not establish who identified him from CCTV footage and that he had already spent two years in custody. Tasleem was directed to be released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed Abu Tasleem's criminal appeal and granted him regular bail, setting aside the lower court's rejection of his bail application. The court found no direct evidence against the appellant despite charges under serious offences including rioting, arson, and UAPA provisions related to a February 2024 violent incident; the court noted that the prosecution could not establish who identified him from CCTV footage and that he had already spent two years in custody. Tasleem was directed to be released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts