MUKESH ALIAS MUNNA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /706/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010183202024

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CRLA /9732/2024

Filing Date

20-11-2024

Registration No

CRLA /706/2024

Registration Date

20-11-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376

Petitioner(s)

MUKESH ALIAS MUNNA

Adv. PARIKSHIT SAINI,SUKHWANI SINGH,SUKHWANI SINGH, ,SUKHWANI SINGH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

21-11-2024

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

31-12-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS (AFTER FRESH) -23

13-11-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

02-08-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS (AFTER FRESH) -23

10-09-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted bail to appellant Mukesh alias Munna in Criminal Appeal No. 706 of 2024, allowing his bail application and suspending his sentence during the appeal pendency. The court found that the conviction under Section 376 IPC was based primarily on DNA evidence without sufficient corroborative support, particularly since the victim (PW6) did not support the prosecution case at trial despite claiming a romantic relationship with the appellant. The appellant must execute a personal bond and furnish two reliable sureties to be released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted bail to appellant Mukesh alias Munna in Criminal Appeal No. 706 of 2024, allowing his bail application and suspending his sentence during the appeal pendency. The court found that the conviction under Section 376 IPC was based primarily on DNA evidence without sufficient corroborative support, particularly since the victim (PW6) did not support the prosecution case at trial despite claiming a romantic relationship with the appellant. The appellant must execute a personal bond and furnish two reliable sureties to be released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case