RAJENDRA KUMAR JOSHI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/2059/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,465,467. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010182382025
Filing Number
C528/9455/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
C528/2059/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRA KUMAR JOSHI
Adv. JITENDRA CHAUDHARY,RAJYAVARDHAN CHAUDHARY,RAJYAVARDHAN CHAUDHARY, ,RAJYAVARDHAN CHAUDHARY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
SMT. RAMA LOHANI/TIWARI
Adv. DIGVIJAY SINGH BISHT,VENKATESH SAH RAVI SHANKAR ARYA H C PATHAK
SITANSHU KAUL
Adv. HARSHIT SANWAL,PANKAJ KAPIL
AMIT KUMAR SHARMA
Adv. VIJAY BHATT,HARSHIT SANWAL
MILIND KUMAR SHARMA
Adv. VIJAY BHATT,HARSHIT SANWAL
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-11-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 05-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 04-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 28-04-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 02-04-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
Orders
Court Decision Summary The High Court dismissed the applicant's criminal application challenging the lower court's rejection of a Section 319 CrPC application to summon respondents. The court upheld the view that a registration officer has no adjudicatory power to verify the vendor's title and cannot refuse registration if procedural compliance is met; the registered document only transfers whatever rights the executant actually possesses. Finding no infirmity in the lower courts' orders after applying judicial scrutiny, the court declined to interfere. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The High Court dismissed the applicant's criminal application challenging the lower court's rejection of a Section 319 CrPC application to summon respondents. The court upheld the view that a registration officer has no adjudicatory power to verify the vendor's title and cannot refuse registration if procedural compliance is met; the registered document only transfers whatever rights the executant actually possesses. Finding no infirmity in the lower courts' orders after applying judicial scrutiny, the court declined to interfere. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts