RAJENDRA KUMAR JOSHI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/2059/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,465,467. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010182382025

Filing Number

C528/9455/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

C528/2059/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,465,467

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA KUMAR JOSHI

    Adv. JITENDRA CHAUDHARY,RAJYAVARDHAN CHAUDHARY,RAJYAVARDHAN CHAUDHARY, ,RAJYAVARDHAN CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. RAMA LOHANI/TIWARI

    Adv. DIGVIJAY SINGH BISHT,VENKATESH SAH RAVI SHANKAR ARYA H C PATHAK

  3. 3.SITANSHU KAUL

    Adv. HARSHIT SANWAL,PANKAJ KAPIL

  4. 4.AMIT KUMAR SHARMA

    Adv. VIJAY BHATT,HARSHIT SANWAL

  5. 5.MILIND KUMAR SHARMA

    Adv. VIJAY BHATT,HARSHIT SANWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The High Court dismissed the applicant's criminal application challenging the lower court's rejection of a Section 319 CrPC application to summon respondents. The court upheld the view that a registration officer has no adjudicatory power to verify the vendor's title and cannot refuse registration if procedural compliance is met; the registered document only transfers whatever rights the executant actually possesses. Finding no infirmity in the lower courts' orders after applying judicial scrutiny, the court declined to interfere. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  7. 28-Apr-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  8. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  9. 02-Apr-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  12. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  13. 09-Feb-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  14. 29-Dec-2025

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 17-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/2059/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court dismissed the applicant's criminal application challenging the lower court's rejection of a Section 319 CrPC application to summon respondents. The court upheld the view that a registration officer has no adjudicatory power to verify the vendor's title and cannot refuse registration if procedural compliance is met; the registered document only transfers whatever rights the executant actually possesses. Finding no infirmity in the lower courts' orders after applying judicial scrutiny, the court declined to interfere. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case