SONAKSHI SHARMA HIMANSHU VADIK vs PIYUSH JAIN — C24/85/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 24. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010181272025
Filing Number
C24/8719/2025
Filing Date
13-Nov-2025
Registration No
C24/85/2025
Registration Date
13-Nov-2025
Judge
Registrar (Judicial)
Coram
Registrar (Judicial)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
HARIDWAR ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONAKSHI SHARMA HIMANSHU VADIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.PIYUSH JAIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Case C24/85/2025 Summary: The court dismissed the C24 application filed by petitioners Sonakshi Sharma and Himanshu Vadik against respondent Piyush Jain on 8 May 2026. Justice Subhash Upadhyay found that despite being directed on 20 November 2025 to serve notice on the respondent, the petitioners failed to take necessary steps for service. The application was dismissed due to the petitioners' non-appearance and continued non-compliance with the court's directions regarding service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
20-Mar-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
-
20-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. C24/85/2025
Case C24/85/2025 Summary: The court dismissed the C24 application filed by petitioners Sonakshi Sharma and Himanshu Vadik against respondent Piyush Jain on 8 May 2026. Justice Subhash Upadhyay found that despite being directed on 20 November 2025 to serve notice on the respondent, the petitioners failed to take necessary steps for service. The application was dismissed due to the petitioners' non-appearance and continued non-compliance with the court's directions regarding service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts