SONAKSHI SHARMA HIMANSHU VADIK vs PIYUSH JAIN — C24/85/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 24. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010181272025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C24/8719/2025

Filing Date

13-11-2025

Registration No

C24/85/2025

Registration Date

13-11-2025

Judge

Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

HARIDWAR ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 24

Petitioner(s)

SONAKSHI SHARMA HIMANSHU VADIK

Respondent(s)

PIYUSH JAIN

Hearing History

Judge: Registrar (Judicial)

20-11-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

08-05-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

20-03-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

13-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

08-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Case C24/85/2025 Summary: The court dismissed the C24 application filed by petitioners Sonakshi Sharma and Himanshu Vadik against respondent Piyush Jain on 8 May 2026. Justice Subhash Upadhyay found that despite being directed on 20 November 2025 to serve notice on the respondent, the petitioners failed to take necessary steps for service. The application was dismissed due to the petitioners' non-appearance and continued non-compliance with the court's directions regarding service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case C24/85/2025 Summary: The court dismissed the C24 application filed by petitioners Sonakshi Sharma and Himanshu Vadik against respondent Piyush Jain on 8 May 2026. Justice Subhash Upadhyay found that despite being directed on 20 November 2025 to serve notice on the respondent, the petitioners failed to take necessary steps for service. The application was dismissed due to the petitioners' non-appearance and continued non-compliance with the court's directions regarding service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case