M/S GOEL ROADWAYS vs BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED BHEL Advocate - BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI — ARBAP/61/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No. 26 of 1996) Section 11(5). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010180342025
Filing Number
ARBAP/8677/2025
Filing Date
12-Nov-2025
Registration No
ARBAP/61/2025
Registration Date
12-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
ARBITRATION APPLICATION(SECTION-11) ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S GOEL ROADWAYS
Adv. ANJALI BHARGAVA,CHETNA BHARGAVA,CHETNA BHARGAVA, ,CHETNA BHARGAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED BHEL Advocate - BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar GuptaView PDF
Case Summary: ARBAP/61/2025 M/s Goel Roadways v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited The Court appointed Mr. K.D. Bhatt, Retired District Judge, as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the parties arising from Contract No. GEMC-511687739003881 dated 27.07.2023. Both parties agreed to the appointment after settlement efforts failed. The office was directed to obtain the arbitrator's consent and disclosures under Section 11(8) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within four weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr Justice G. NarendarView PDF
-
13-Nov-2025
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
12-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. ARBAP/61/2025
Case Summary: ARBAP/61/2025 M/s Goel Roadways v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited The Court appointed Mr. K.D. Bhatt, Retired District Judge, as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the parties arising from Contract No. GEMC-511687739003881 dated 27.07.2023. Both parties agreed to the appointment after settlement efforts failed. The office was directed to obtain the arbitrator's consent and disclosures under Section 11(8) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within four weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts