RATAN LAL SHARMA vs MS APARNA SONDHIYAL Advocate - C.S.C. — CLCON/392/2024

Case under Contempt of Court's Act,1971 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010178562024

Filing Number

CLCON/8349/2024

Filing Date

12-Nov-2024

Registration No

CLCON/392/2024

Registration Date

12-Nov-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court's Act,1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RATAN LAL SHARMA

    Adv. BHUPESH KANDPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MS APARNA SONDHIYAL Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.JASWANT SINGH RAWAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the contempt petition filed by Ratan Lal Sharma alleging willful disobedience of an order directing property demarcation proceedings. The respondent submitted that the August 8, 2024 order had already been complied with, and the petitioner subsequently abandoned the matter, leading the court to close the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Mar-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  4. 05-Dec-2024

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  5. 13-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  6. 13-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/392/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the contempt petition filed by Ratan Lal Sharma alleging willful disobedience of an order directing property demarcation proceedings. The respondent submitted that the August 8, 2024 order had already been complied with, and the petitioner subsequently abandoned the matter, leading the court to close the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case