TANISHA ARORA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/2006/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 406,506. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010177812025
Filing Number
C528/9226/2025
Filing Date
10-Nov-2025
Registration No
C528/2006/2025
Registration Date
10-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TANISHA ARORA
Adv. D N SHARMA,J P PANDEY,J P PANDEY, ,MANJU BAHUGUNA,J P PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SUMIT ARORA
-
3.SMT. SHIVANI ARORA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: C-528/2006/2025 (Tanisha Arora v. State of Uttarakhand) The court adjourned the case after finding that notices to respondents 2 and 3 (Sumit Arora and Smt. Shivani Arora) were returned unserved, as they are not at their furnished addresses but residing elsewhere in Uttarakhand. Petitioner's counsel was granted three weeks to locate correct addresses and effect proper service. The matter is listed for further hearing after service is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Admission Matters -25
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
08-Jan-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
05-Jan-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
20-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
12-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. C528/2006/2025
Case Summary: C-528/2006/2025 (Tanisha Arora v. State of Uttarakhand) The court adjourned the case after finding that notices to respondents 2 and 3 (Sumit Arora and Smt. Shivani Arora) were returned unserved, as they are not at their furnished addresses but residing elsewhere in Uttarakhand. Petitioner's counsel was granted three weeks to locate correct addresses and effect proper service. The matter is listed for further hearing after service is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts