MOHD ANZAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/2160/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22/29/60. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010177412025
Filing Number
BA1/9206/2025
Filing Date
07-11-2025
Registration No
BA1/2160/2025
Registration Date
07-11-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
29th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHD ANZAR
Adv. VISHWA PRAKASH BAHUGUNA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-11-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 28-05-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 10-02-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 29-12-2025 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 08-12-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: BA1/2160/2025 - Mohd Anzar v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted regular bail to Mohd Anzar, arrested for alleged possession of pharmaceutical drugs (Tramadol, Acetaminophen, Dicyclomine, and Alprazolam) under NDPS Act sections 8/22/29/60. The court found prima facie procedural irregularities undermining the prosecution's credibility: the FIR/Case Crime number appeared on documents (inventory report and arrest memo) allegedly prepared before FIR registration, and seized samples took 13 days to reach FSL Chandigarh despite being only 3 hours away, with no satisfactory explanation for the transit delay. Applying the Supreme Court's principle in *Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kashif*, the court held substantial procedural lapses and unexplained delays concerning sample custody warranted bail, citing the applicant's clean criminal record and prolonged custody since September 2025. Bail was granted subject to regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and travel restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA1/2160/2025 - Mohd Anzar v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court granted regular bail to Mohd Anzar, arrested for alleged possession of pharmaceutical drugs (Tramadol, Acetaminophen, Dicyclomine, and Alprazolam) under NDPS Act sections 8/22/29/60. The court found prima facie procedural irregularities undermining the prosecution's credibility: the FIR/Case Crime number appeared on documents (inventory report and arrest memo) allegedly prepared before FIR registration, and seized samples took 13 days to reach FSL Chandigarh despite being only 3 hours away, with no satisfactory explanation for the transit delay. Applying the Supreme Court's principle in *Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kashif*, the court held substantial procedural lapses and unexplained delays concerning sample custody warranted bail, citing the applicant's clean criminal record and prolonged custody since September 2025. Bail was granted subject to regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and travel restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts